August 4

ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefiventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi

Format XFS in Linux: sudo mkfs -t xfs /dev/sdb1, It may be related to the motherboard USB 2.0/3.0 port. What you want is for users to be alerted if someone picked a Linux or Microsoft media, and the UEFI bootloader was altered from the original. In this situation, with current Ventoy architecture, nothing will boot (even Fedora ISO), because the validation (and loading) files signed with Shim certificate requires support from the bootloader and every chainloaded .efi file (it uses custom protocol, regular EFI functions can't be used. And of course, people expect that if they run UEFIinSecureBoot or similar software, whose goal is explicitly stated as such, it will effectively remove Secure Boot. arnaud. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. Tested ISO: https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso. Reply. Interestingly enough, the ISO does contain the efi files as I made sure to convert the whole IMG, which on the other hand is the basis for the creation of a memtest flash drive. 10 comments andycuong commented on Mar 17, 2021 completed meeuw mentioned this issue on Jul 31, 2021 [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1 #1031 A lot of work to do. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. Optional custom shim protocol registration (not included in this build, creates issues). Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. "+String(e)+r);return new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US').format(Math.round(569086*a+n))}var rng=document.querySelector("#restoro-downloads");rng.innerHTML=gennr();rng.removeAttribute("id");var restoroDownloadLink=document.querySelector("#restoro-download-link"),restoroDownloadArrow=document.querySelector(".restoro-download-arrow"),restoroCloseArrow=document.querySelector("#close-restoro-download-arrow");if(window.navigator.vendor=="Google Inc."){restoroDownloadLink.addEventListener("click",function(){setTimeout(function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="flex"},500),restoroCloseArrow.addEventListener("click",function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="none"})});}. The USB partition shows very slow after install Ventoy. To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. Okay, I installed linux mint 64 bit on this laptop before. No bootfile found for UEFI! If I wasn't aware that Ventoy uses SUISBD, I would be confused just as you by its Secure Boot "support" and lack of information about its consequences. It says that no bootfile found for uefi. WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure that, if you have a Secure Boot capable system, then firmware manufacturers might add a condition that you can only use TPM-based encryption if you also have Secure Boot enabled, as this can help reduce attack vectors against the TPM (by preventing execution of arbitrary code at the early UEFI boot stage, which may make poking around the TPM easier if it has a vulnerability). snallinux-.6-x86_64.iso - 1.40 GB Astra Linux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. we have no ability to boot it unless we disable the secure boot because it is not signed. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. try 1.0.09 beta1? As I understand, you only tested via UEFI, right? What matters is what users perceive and expect. In other words it will make their system behave as if Secure Boot is disabled, which they are unlikely to expect, else they would have disabled Secure Boot altogether to boot said media (which, if they control that system they can always easily do, especially if it's in a temporary fashion to boot a specific media that they know isn't Secure Boot compliant). Rename it as MemTest86_64.efi (or something similar). You can grab latest ISO files here : boots, but kernel panic: did not find boot partitions; opens a debugger. In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. Then Ventoy will load without issue if the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS. they reviewed all the source code). I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. Thanks a lot. If that was the case, I would most likely sign Ventoy for my SHIM (provided it doesn't let through unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled, which is the precise issue we are trying to solve) since, even if it's supposed to be a competitor of Rufus, I think it's a very nice solution and I'm always more than happy to direct people who would like to have a multiboot version of Rufus to use Ventoy instead. Ubuntu has shim which load only Ubuntu, etc. memz.mp4. Sign in DiskGenius It's the job of Ventoy's custom GRUB to ensure that what is being chainloaded is Secure Boot compliant because that's what users will expect from a trustworthy boot application in a Secure Boot environment. and select the efisys.bin from desktop and save the .iso Now the Minitool.iso should boot into UEFI with Ventoy. ***> wrote: And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. 5. extservice And IMO, anything that attempts to push the idea that, maybe, allowing silent boot of unsigned bootloaders is not that bad, is actually doing a major disservice to users, as it does weaken the security of their system and, if this is really what a user wants, they can and should disable Secure Boot. Getting the same error as @rderooy. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Probably you didn't delete the file completely but to the recycle bin. No bootfile found for UEFI! Well occasionally send you account related emails. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. @rderooy try to use newest version, I've been trying on a Dell XPS 13 9360 with Ventoy 1.0.34 UEFI running and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso does not work. Menu. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat I really fail to fathom how people here are disputing that if someone agrees to enroll Ventoy in a Secure Boot environment, it only means that they agree to trust the Ventoy application, and not that they grant it the right to just run whatever bootloader anybody will now be able to throw at their computer through Ventoy (which may very well be a malicious bootloader ran by someone who is not the owner of that computer but who knows or hopes that the user enrolled Ventoy). Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. Ventoy will search all the directories and sub directories recursively to find all the iso files and list them in the boot menu. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' Indeed I have erroneously downloaded memtest v4 because I just read ".iso" and went for it. ", same error during creating windows 7 Thank you! @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. Any ideas? BIOS Mode Both Partition Style GPT Disk . Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. In Ventoy I had enabled Secure Boot and GPT. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-KDE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 952MB @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? Does shim still needed in this case? Tried the same ISOs in Easy2Boot and they worked for me. Hi, HDClone can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode for legacy BIOS, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. Remove Ventoy secure boot key. I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? And we've already been over whether USB should be treated differently than internal SATA or NVMe (which, in your opinion it should, and which in mine, and I will assert the majority of people who enable Secure Boot, it shouldn't). I have the same error with EndeavorOS_Atlantis_neo_21_5.iso using ventoy 1.0.70. the EndeavorOS iso boots with no issues when on it's on usb, but not through ventoy. Ventoy is a tool to create bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? And, unless you're going to stand behind every single Ventoy user to explain why you think it shouldn't matter that Ventoy will let any unsigned bootloader through, that's just not going to fly. @ValdikSS, I'm not seeing much being debated, when the link you point to appears to indicate that pretty much everybody is in agreement that loading unsigned kernels from GRUB, in a Secure Boot environment, is a bug (hence why it was reported as such). So I apologise for that. This solution is only for Legacy BIOS, not UEFI. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===> Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. Nierewa Junior Member. 1.0.84 IA32 www.ventoy.net ===> Ventoy doesn't load the kernel directly inside the ISO file(e.g. If someone has physical access to a system then Secure Boot is useless period. Do I still need to display a warning message? https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed executables when Secure Boot is enabled, Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements. This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi eficompress infile outfile. I can confirm it was the reason for some ISOs to not boot (ChimeraOS, Manjaro Gnome). I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. @blackcrack I test it in a VirtualMachine (VMWare with secure boot enabled). 2. . and leave it up to the user. In that case there's no difference in booting from USB or plugging in a SATA or NVMe drive with the same content as you'd put on USB (and we can debate about intrusion detection if you want). - . openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB But, even as I don't actually support the idea that Secure Boot is useless if someone has physical access to the device (that was mostly Steve positing this as a means to justify that not being able to detect Secure Boot breaches on USB media isn't that big a deal), I do believe there currently still exist a bit too many ways to ensure that you can compromise a machine, if you have access to said machine. Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. To create a USB stick that is compatible with USB 3.0 using the native boot experience of the Windows 10 Technical Preview media (or Windows 8/Windows 8.1), use DiskPart to format the USB stick and set the partition to active, then copy all of the files from inside the ISO . This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. Ventoy also supports BIOS Legacy. If you use the Linux kernel's EFI stub loader or ELILO, you may need to store your kernel on the ESP, so creating an ESP on the large end of the scale is advisable. For Hiren's BootCD HBCD_PE_x64.iso has been tested in UEFI mode. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. slax 15.0 boots Well occasionally send you account related emails. When user whitelist Venoy that means they trust Ventoy (e.g. Will these functions in Ventoy be disabled if Secure Boot is detected? same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. privacy statement. First and foremost, disable legacy boot (AKA BIOS emulation). Is there a way to force Ventoy to boot in Legacy mode? @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. Could you please also try via BIOS/Legacy mode? Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. Just right-click on "This PC" on the desktop, select "Manage", and click on "Disk Management . Therefore, unless Ventoy makes it very explicit that "By enrolling Ventoy for Secure Boot, you understand that you are also granting anyone with the capability of running non Secure Boot enabled boot loaders on your computer, including potential malicious ones that would otherwise have been detected by Secure Boot", I will maintain that there is a rather important security issue that needs to be addressed. I have some systems which won't offer legacy boot option if UEFI is present at the same time. But i have added ISO file by Rufus. I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. While Ventoy is designed to boot in with secure boot enabled, if your computer does not support the secure boot feature, then an error will result. Seriously? Reboot your computer and select ventoy-delete-key-1.-iso. Secure Boot is tricky to deal with and can (rightfully) be seen as a major inconvenience instead of yet another usually desireable line of defence against malware (but by all means not a panacea). Strelec WinPE) Ctrl+r for ventoy debug mode Ctrl+h or h for help m checksum a file @ventoy I can confirm this, using the exact same iso. I see your point, this CorePlus ISO is indeed missing that EFI file. Would disabling Secure Boot in Ventoy help? However, considering that in the case of Ventoy, you are basically going to chain load GRUB 2, and that most of the SHIMs have been designed to handle precisely that, it might be easier to get Ventoy accepted as a shim payload. From the booted OS, they are then free to do whatever they want to the system. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). error was now displayed in 1080p. However, some ISO files dont support UEFI mode so booting those files in UEFI will not work. @pbatard, have you tested it? VMware or VirtualBox) @pbatard your point) and you also want them to actually do their designated job, including letting you know, if you have Secure Boot enabled, when some third party UEFI boot loader didn't pass Secure Boot validation, even if that boot loader will only ever be run from someone who has to have physical access to your computer in the first place. EDIT: all give ERROR on HP Laptop : legacy - ok Once here, scroll down and move to the "Download Windows 11 Disk Image (ISO) for x64 devices" section. Ventoy is open-source software that allows users to create ISO, WIM, IMG, VHS(x), and EFI files onto a bootable USB drive. debes activar modo uefi en el bios Agreed. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Something about secure boot? In a real use case, when you have several Linux distros (not all of which have Secure Boot support), several unsigned UEFI utilities, it's just easier to temporary disable Secure Boot with SUISBD method. Which is why you want to have as many of these enabled in parallel when they exist (such as TPM + Secure Boot, i.e. ElementaryOS boots just fine. puedes usar las particiones gpt o mbr. We recommend downloading this PC Repair tool (rated Great on TrustPilot.com) to easily address them. If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. 1: The Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool is not compatible with USB 3.0. You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. 04-23-2021 02:00 PM. fdisk: Create a primary partition with partition type EFI (FAT-12/16/32). There are many other applications that can create bootable disks but Ventoy comes with its sets of features. Does the iso boot from a VM as a virtual DVD? If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. The file size will be over 5 GB. Is Ventoy checking md5sums and refusing to load an iso that doesn't match or something? ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! The MX21_February_x64.iso seems OK in VirtualBox for me. Main Edition Support. Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. Yes. @ventoy used Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk files to disable UEFI file policy, that's the easiest way, but not a 'proper' one. Download Debian net installer. Another issue about Porteus and Aporteus : if we copy ISO via dd or other tools or copy ISO contents to EFI partition of USB work perfectly in UEFI. Can't say for others, but I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. I'm not talking about CSM. function gennr(){var n=480678,t=new Date,e=t.getMonth()+1,r=t.getDay(),a=parseFloat("0. Newbie. Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso also boots fine in Legacy mode on IdeaPad 300 with Ventoy 1.0.57. MediCAT It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. And, for any of this to work, Ventoy would still need to independently solve the problem of allowing unsigned bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled @ventoy For more information on how to download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, we have a guide for that. da1: quirks=0x2. Any way to disable UEFI booting capability from Ventoy and only leave legacy? /s. BUT with Ventoy 1.0.74 legacy boot from the same ISO I get a black square in centre of menu (USB LED is flashing so appears to load). And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. You can change the type or just delete the partition. privacy statement. Help !!!!!!! Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. For example, GRUB 2 is licensed under GPLv3 and will not be signed. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member I used Rufus on a new USB with the same iso image, and when I booted to it with UEFI it booted successfully. Thus, being able to check that an installer or boot loader wasn't tampered with is not a "nice bonus" but is something that must be enforced always in a Secure Boot enabled environment, regardless of the type of media you are booting from, because Secure Boot is very much designed to help users ensure that, when they install an OS, and provided that OS has a chain of trust that extends all the way, any alteration of any of the binary code that the OS executes, be it as part of the installation or when the OS is running, will be detected and reported to the user and prevent the altered binary code to run. Thus, on a system where Secure Boot is enabled, users should rightfully expect to be alerted if the EFI bootloader of an ISO booted through Ventoy is not Secure Boot signed or if its signature doesn't validate. Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. But, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM and that's actually the reason why it could be signed by Microsoft (once I switched the bootloader license from GPLv3+ to GPLv2+ and rewrote a UEFI driver derived from GPLv2+ code, which I am definitely not happy at all about), because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, it can not be used to chain load anything that isn't itself Secure Boot signed. accomodate this. If someone uses Ventoy with Secure Boot, then Ventoy should not green light UEFI bootloaders that don't comply with Secure Boot. Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". I was able to create a Rufus image using "GPT for UEFI" and the latest Windows ISO (1709 updated in 12/2017).

Gollum Talking To Himself Script, Titusville Pa Missing Person, Port St Lucie Police News, Articles V


Tags


ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefiYou may also like

ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefichicago tribune audience demographics

jean christensen andre the giant wife
{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi