editor decision started nature rejectioneditor decision started nature rejection

A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). Help us improve this article with your feedback. For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. I am currently continuing at SunAgri as an R&D engineer. Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision Most professional editors have eyes on the page from four to six hours a day; any more tends to dull the focus needed to spot issues. Authors are understandably motivated to dispute rejections; scientists are evaluated on their publication record, and even if their own positions are secure, senior authors feel a responsibility to promote the professional advancement of their students. The author submits a manuscript and it receives a tracking number. You can appeal to the editorial board, giving a point-by-point argument against the editors views. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. So in conclusion, yes, editors can add reviews but should do so with extreme caution and rarity. Thank you for visiting nature.com. I am at the same stage. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. Was your paper accepted? The Decision Started status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journals editorial board is in the process of making a decision. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. The Journals and Editorial press office distributes embargoed mailings highlighting upcoming content to registered journalists six days in advance of publication. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Rejections based on serious errors are frustrating for authors and damaging to the journal's credibility, and so we have a procedure for reconsidering decisions at the author's request. Either rejection or sending it out for review. Editors, on the other hand, must guard against a different category of mistake, as it is their responsibility to balance the intense investment of the authors in a particular decision against the more diffuse interests not only of their readers but also of other authors. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Thanks! Is there a proper earth ground point in this switch box? this is indeed the general case, also in my journal. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. After a paper is accepted, it is subedited (copyedited) to ensure maximum clarity and reach, a process that enhances the value of papers in various ways. ensure that the figures and tables are clear and will fit in the space available. If both reviewers give negative recommendations, it is much less likely for the editor to accept a paper. The corresponding (or other single designated) author is responsible on behalf of all co-authors for the accuracy of all content, including spelling of names and current affiliations of all co-authors, so please ensure these are checked carefully. After review, Nature Communications rejected it because of reason X. Hi! Editors also strongly encourage authors in appropriate disciplines to include a simple schematic summarizing the main conclusion of the paper, which can be published with the paper as Supplementary Information. [2] In any state, sovereignty is assigned to the person, body, or institution that has the ultimate authority over other people in order to establish a law or change . Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. One perk, however, is having the choice and control over what I . Make sure that your arguments are backed by solid evidence. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. //--> [1] Sovereignty entails hierarchy within the state, as well as external autonomy for states. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Sometimes they are more busy. Is it fair to reject manuscript with few words of comments after long 9 months of review? Referees are chosen for the following reasons: Although Nature's editors themselves judge whether a paper is likely to interest readers outside its own immediate field, referees often give helpful advice, for example if the work described is not as significant as the editors thought or has undersold its significance. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. any technical failings that need to be addressed before the authors' case is established. Obviously, the most difficult situations are those in which the reviewers arrive at nearly or . 2. edit the language for maximum clarity and precision for those in other disciplines. How to proceed? If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . All referees agree to Nature's conditions before Nature sends them a manuscript to assess. These are very political journals. Sorry we couldn't be helpful. We will continue to publish peer reviewer reports where authors opt in to our separate transparent peer review scheme. Even if the reviewers give positive recommendations, the editor can decide to reject a paper. The titles of forthcoming papers will be listed on the mailing, along with the corresponding authors' contact details, which means authors may receive media enquiries relating to their paper during this embargo period. If an author remains unsatisfied, he or she can write to the Editor, citing the manuscript reference number. Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor 118.0 days to accept manuscript. How do I align things in the following tabular environment? Under these circumstances, further experiments or technical work are usually required to address some or all of the referees concerns, and revised papers are sent back to some or all of the referees for a second opinion. Do the revisions and resubmit. Nature is a British weekly scientific journal founded and based in London, England.As a multidisciplinary publication, Nature features peer-reviewed research from a variety of academic disciplines, mainly in science and technology. Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. To obtain We do our best to insure a fair and consistent process for all authors, but procedural concerns must be balanced against our obligation to maintain, and if possible raise, the journal's overall standards. How to match a specific column position till the end of line? How long does it take to publish a paper in Journal? edit: so no. At some point, they may come back to you and ask you to suggest names (additional names, if you had already given some when you originally submitted the paper). [CDATA[// >